Economic Oriented Surabaya City in Development Planning

Measuring the welfare level of a country only relying on statistical data from per capita income or Gross National Product (GNP) is a step that is often done. However, these data have never been correlated with data on environmental damage, for example, or data on the health level of residents at a certain age (Priemus, 1999: 219). In fact, if we examine the statement in the previous paragraph, high economic activity will also produce high waste material, which in the end leads to great pressure on the environment and has a negative impact on organisms that inhabit the environment. The bad impact can be in the form of health problems on the human body, the personal implication is that it interferes with work productivity as well as high costs for health care. Meanwhile, the political implication is that the government will be under high budget pressure to finance health services for its citizens.

Courtesy of Freepick.com 


There are problems inherent in urban spatial planning. The issue is related to the concept of sustainable development (SD). Sustainable development is a concept that is still under debate, there is no consensus among experts to determine the definition of the concept of SD itself, so that ambiguity and multiple interpretations of SD seem to have become natural.

The issue of the protection of mangrove forest areas in the city of Surabaya has become a controversial issue so that it is one of the causes for the ratification of the Raperda on the RTRW of the city of Surabaya. The mangrove forest area continues to shrink due to the urgency of residential development. In 1978 the area of ​​mangrove forest in Surabaya was 3,300 hectares, in 1985 it had shrunk to 2,500 hectares. The Surabaya City Government has designated the east coast of Surabaya (Pamurbaya) as a mangrove conservation area. Various efforts have been made, including rehabilitation, environmental education, and development training. The commitment of the Surabaya City Government is strengthened by Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2007 concerning the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) for the City of Surabaya. The Surabaya City Government has also allocated a 2013 budget for land acquisition which is now controlled by the developer.

The Raperda on Spatial Planning for the City of Surabaya has not yet received approval from the DPRD. Although the Raperda has been delayed for approximately two years, the DPRD has reconsidered the articles in the Raperda on RTRW which do not pay attention to ecological aspects, in particular the determination of space for Mangroves. There is a tug-of-war between actors in the article that regulates mangroves.

Spatial planning is political so that friction of interests is unavoidable. The DPRD fights for the public interest but this political representative institution also reduces the public interest at the same time. Therefore, spatial planning is not merely a technical domain but also a political domain and even enters into political economy. In the political domain, the contestation of power in planning represented by the actors has their respective interest targets in accordance with the authority and power they have. Especially in the current era of regional autonomy, the power of a Spatial Planning Law cannot simply be operationalized in an autonomous region. Each city has its own uniqueness related to the growth and development of the city which is influenced by the process of urbanization, suburbanization and the process of sub-urbanization followed by a decline in population in the city center, as well as the process of reurbanization or deurbanization so that villages (suburban areas) gradually disappear into urban areas. 

Spatial planning politics that focuses on planning aspects is dangerous, threatens the survival of people's lives, and the existence of the city. The ideal spatial politics must harmonize various social, economic, cultural, and environmental factors. Ignoring one aspect or vice versa, emphasizing one aspect means creating inequality or damaging the social and ecological environment of the city. Saving the ecology by building green open spaces is a good step. Likewise, providing open public spaces is much better. But the problem is that development is expensive, the government cannot provide green open spaces or build public spaces that can be accessed and used by the community as a place for social interaction. There is a trend nowadays (starting from the 20th and 21st centuries, existing and available public spaces are embedded in buildings called malls and plazas.

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Carok Research 2021

Collective Violence/Social Movement of Student?

The significance of studying Political Science: Teaching Activities 2022