Pedestrian Zones Serve as Spatial and Social Spaces for City Residents

The government’s policy in developing pedestrian zones with various facilities shows that neither the  government nor society has used a spatial perspective to produce public spaces. Soja (2010) analyzes  that public spaces in urban areas should emphasize the spatial perspective. The social aspect of public  space development should be taken into account. There is no public space that is socially neutral. Soja  supplemented the arguments from Lefebvre & Harvey about citizen’s inseparable rights to the city.  Designing public spaces should pay attention to spatial design aspects and the social aspects of those  spaces. Every new public space that is built and repaired has a considerable impact on others’ daily  lives. On the one hand, the installation of chairs and other facilities increases pedestrian convenience yet  reduces the pavement’s substance.
Courtesy of Freepick.com



The opinion, as mentioned earlier, strengthens the concept of the Right to City by Lefebvre, Harvey,  Soja, and other spatial academics. The presence of pedestrian zones is not only a struggle to eliminate  alienation from citizens to public spaces; it is also a method to fulfill citizens’ rights. Therefore, citizens  are integrated into a network of social connections. Citizens’ rights to pedestrian zones are part of  citizens’ rights to cities. In claiming their rights to the city, residents can also use pedestrian space as  their social right. There is a social significance of the public sphere managed by the government and the  private sector. Therefore, removing street vendors from the pedestrian space is an action that can lead  to resistance from them. In a theoretical frame, public spaces in urban areas result from two aspects of  development planning, namely social space and spatial space. Both aspects are the result of urbanism  and capitalism. The inevitable effect of urbanization and the rapid flow of capitalism can be ended  through the urban revolution (Harvey 2008). According to Harvey: “The right to cities is much more  than individual freedom to access urban resources.” The right to the city provides citizens the right to  change themselves by changing the city. Furthermore, it is a general right, not entitled to individuals,  because the transformation is highly dependent on collective force to reshape the urbanization process. 

Harvey argues that the freedom to create and rebuild cities and people is one of the most valuable human  rights. According to Harvey and Lefebvre, the presence of broad pedestrian zones and their facilities can  be interpreted as removing citizens’ rights to the city, eliminating public rights to public spaces. The existence of cities is also influenced by urbanization (population and capital). In the cycle of  capitalism, cities around the world require capital to produce surplus products. In Harvey’s (2008)  analysis, the relationship between this type of urbanization and capitalism is two-way: “capitalism  continues to produce the surplus products that urbanization needs. In the contrary, capitalism requires  urbanization to absorb the excess products that it continues to production cycle.” They strive for tangible  improvements to produce stronger communities and better conditions for all members of society and  future generations. 

Urbanization has become capitalistic and has become an instrument in the hands of  capitalists and a significant feature of the capitalism cycle. Furthermore, city life is a revolutionary battleground daily. Space domination originated from the social  relations of capitalist production. Urban space and cities’ existence results from capitalist production  processes (Castells 1979, Harvey 2008). Space is a political interest because it is a medium, instrument,  the purpose of a struggle, and conflict (Lefebvre 1991). In the space contestation, we acknowledge the  dominant space and the dominated space. Castells (1977) argues that the city contains an ideological  dimension and a collective reproduction of labor because a city is an area that runs a capitalist system.  Public spaces in urban areas result from a plan that determines the spatial practices of communities in  public spaces.

Komentar

Posting Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Carok Research 2021

Gambar
 The most dangerous effect of carok is vengeance. There is a struggle between symbolic power and symbolic power. In Maduranese culture, symbolic power lies in both men and women. In carok there are a series of values in the form of a show of real power and symbolic power: protecting and maintaining the honor and dignity that is inherent by individuals.  Therefore, if someone interferes with their existence (interfering with their symbolic power) then the individual will act in a carok way. This matter formed the structure of an aggressive mindset among the Madurese community then. They consider that the ability of carok is an act that is appreciated in the Madurese society. Thus, carok is legitimized and accepted as a socially cultural 'right' act.
Baca selengkapnya

Collective Violence/Social Movement of Student?

Gambar
Lately, students' moral movement is rare transformed into a political movement, except for gain power. Student violence incident in the city of Makassar-South Sulawesi, has tarnished the world of education student height and existence. Student as part of community life, partisanship students in the interests of society do not use violent and disruptive means public interest. Violent action base students are ethical/moral values and reason, and it becomes a reference in every action the horns. Students have a need to self-actualization, and this manifests itself in the role of social life through his thinking and leadership in activities in the community. Violence run by students can be understood as strategy to win the battle between student/student group by line ethnic and ideological. can't be denied, there is a role from the local political context of the city of Makassar and national against the occurrence of acts of violence and student vandalism. Student violence tends to
Baca selengkapnya

The significance of studying Political Science: Teaching Activities 2022

Gambar
 The Political Science major of Airlangga University teach their scholars to master some essential skills that will help you obtaining success on your career. Most college assignments have their own way to develop every scholar’s skills. There are also a number of courses that teach you specific skills to read, understand, and provide solutions to political and governmental problems. These special skills are acquired through practical lectures in the field (practicing in applying qualitative methods, conducting in-depth interviews, describing political institutions, political parties, political movements, student demonstrations, strikes and labor demonstrations in urban areas, and so forth). Practical lectures by the field are intended to train scholars to argue qualitatively and quantitatively/statistically. The significance of studying Political Science is that it can improve critical thinking skills, gaining the ability to argue over critical argumentation, analytical writing skills
Baca selengkapnya