Commodification and conversion of pedestrian zone functions by residents of the Surabaya City
According to Lefebvre & Harvey, the concept of the right to the city is suitable to frame the reality of street vendors’ struggle to gain their right to access public pedestrian spaces. Street vendors uses the pedestrian zone as an area to place their stalls to sell food and drinks, sell used goods, and more. In this case, street vendors were unable to fight against the dominant power of the city government. Therefore, street vendors have become a subordinate class that is unable to participate inclusively in the political process, especially in planning the pedestrian spaces development. The street vendors’ struggle to gain access to pedestrian zones cannot be achieved through revolution. However, capitalism, which is embedded in the life of street vendors, is a method for them to get their rights over the city.
The circumstances influenced the government to design a sophisticated pedestrian zone with supporting facilities, which causes these to become an exclusive space and no longer multi-functional for people in urban areas. Studies in various countries show pedestrian zones as public spaces face various challenges because of their various functions, which are not solely for pedestrian mobility but also other public means. As a public space, the pedestrian zone becomes a meeting area for interaction between residents. There are public rights, political space, and habitable space in the pedestrian zone, and a space for trade (Agyeman & Zavetovski 2015; Madanipour et al. 2013). Ehrenfeucht and Sideris (2007) studied pedestrian zones in five cities in the United States: Boston, Los Angeles, New York, Miami, and Seattle. In pedestrian zones, there is confusion arises because of the characteristics of them as public spaces. With these characteristics, pedestrian zones carry ambiguous boundaries on their public status, competition for particular uses from street vendors, and government control. Pedestrian zone as a public space is in the dynamics of negotiation and conflict between users and potential users. Lefebvre (1991) addressed that society’s spatial practice in urban space is the right of citizens to the city.
This study shows that pedestrianization gives the impression of environmentally friendly and pedestrian friendly space from the bright city perspective. The existing pedestrian zones in public facilities such as hospitals, offices, shops, schools show spatial practices that support the relationship between social groups and environmental aspects. However, social groups from low-income populations will use the pedestrian zone as space to trade and fulfill their daily needs. This spatial practice was attacked by neoliberal groups who requested the city government to control the pedestrian zone’s economic activities. Thus, they are no longer functioned as trading places to meet the working class’s needs but are designed and constructed to be clear from street vendors. In Harvey’s logic, this kind of pedestrianization proves the government’s strength in practicing predatory politics and depriving the public of groups of the urban poor who use the pedestrian zones to earn money.
Komentar
Posting Komentar